Comments on: Throwback Sundays: Six Recommendations for a Swimming Watch, from Our Archives
https://deployant.com/throwback-sundays-six-recommendations-for-a-swimming-watch-from-our-archives/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=throwback-sundays-six-recommendations-for-a-swimming-watch-from-our-archives
The watch magazine for collectors, by collectorsTue, 23 Aug 2016 01:05:58 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2
By: Stef
https://deployant.com/throwback-sundays-six-recommendations-for-a-swimming-watch-from-our-archives/#comment-116860
Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:05:58 +0000https://deployant.com/?p=17473#comment-116860Any watch rated to 100m will be fine for swimming so there’s really no special reason to promote these. This is more like..the watches YOU would CHOOSE for swimming. You could take any number of seikos, casios, Rolexes, Oris’s, Tudors etc for swimming. My point being that any good sports watch these days ought to be able to handle swimming.
]]>
By: Thomas Jung
https://deployant.com/throwback-sundays-six-recommendations-for-a-swimming-watch-from-our-archives/#comment-116828
Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:57:04 +0000https://deployant.com/?p=17473#comment-116828Nice article about swimming watches, but what a funny choice: the last one (Richard Mille 27) was a joke, wasn’t it?
What about affordable and interesting watches like the Ulysse Nardin Marine Chronometer or the Rolex’ Sub or the Sea-Dweller or the Panerai Luminor 1950 Submersible Amagnet (PAM 389)?
]]>