https://deployant.com/throwback-sundays-six-recommendations-for-a-swimming-watch-from-our-archives/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=throwback-sundays-six-recommendations-for-a-swimming-watch-from-our-archives The watch magazine for collectors, by collectors Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:05:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 https://deployant.com/throwback-sundays-six-recommendations-for-a-swimming-watch-from-our-archives/#comment-116860 Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:05:58 +0000 https://deployant.com/?p=17473#comment-116860 Any watch rated to 100m will be fine for swimming so there’s really no special reason to promote these. This is more like..the watches YOU would CHOOSE for swimming. You could take any number of seikos, casios, Rolexes, Oris’s, Tudors etc for swimming. My point being that any good sports watch these days ought to be able to handle swimming.

]]> https://deployant.com/throwback-sundays-six-recommendations-for-a-swimming-watch-from-our-archives/#comment-116828 Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:57:04 +0000 https://deployant.com/?p=17473#comment-116828 Nice article about swimming watches, but what a funny choice: the last one (Richard Mille 27) was a joke, wasn’t it?
What about affordable and interesting watches like the Ulysse Nardin Marine Chronometer or the Rolex’ Sub or the Sea-Dweller or the Panerai Luminor 1950 Submersible Amagnet (PAM 389)?

]]>