Comments on: Review: Hanhart 417 ES, a re-issued historic chronograph from the 1950s gets worn and tested https://deployant.com/review-hanhart-417-es-a-re-issued-historic-chronograph-from-the-1950s-gets-worn-and-tested/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=review-hanhart-417-es-a-re-issued-historic-chronograph-from-the-1950s-gets-worn-and-tested The watch magazine for collectors, by collectors Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:50:42 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 By: Peter Chong https://deployant.com/review-hanhart-417-es-a-re-issued-historic-chronograph-from-the-1950s-gets-worn-and-tested/#comment-130210 Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:50:42 +0000 https://deployant.com/?p=56894#comment-130210 In reply to Jan.

You should go try it. It wears smaller than 42mm. It might (or might not) still work for you.

]]> By: Jan https://deployant.com/review-hanhart-417-es-a-re-issued-historic-chronograph-from-the-1950s-gets-worn-and-tested/#comment-130209 Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:18:32 +0000 https://deployant.com/?p=56894#comment-130209 At 42 mm it is way too large for me. The original size would have been perfect.

]]> By: Gav https://deployant.com/review-hanhart-417-es-a-re-issued-historic-chronograph-from-the-1950s-gets-worn-and-tested/#comment-130208 Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:35:38 +0000 https://deployant.com/?p=56894#comment-130208 A very popular watch, I’ve been told. Can see why.

]]>